I first learned about ACTA, American Council of Trustees and Alumni when I heard Anne Neal, president of the organization speak. Anne is a very articulate person with an obvious passion for improving our higher education status. The approach ACTA takes is to first provide objective data on the status of our most important colleges and universities. They work with college trustees, alumni and the media to advocate improvements, that is, corrections to the problems that turn up in their research.
While any of you who have read any of my K-12 education writings, either on my blog, The Education Onion or on Scribd.com know that I have focused on the K-12 area. ACTA’s findings mesh well with what I have found. It seems that the colleges including the most elite, have been acting to dumb down the education that college graduates receive. That is especially true in the traditional sense.
That is exactly what has happened in K-12 as well. In K-12 the dumbing down process started with the replacing of the American Common School approaches pioneered by Horace Mann and others with the Progressive approaches of John Dewey et al. The basic change was from the content rich (knowledge based) approach of the Common Schools to the content poor (process based) approach of the Progressives.
There are several problems with the Progressive approach. In a nutshell, it works much more poorly than the content rich approach it replaced. This is proven by the results of our best competitor nations who use the content rich approach to teach their kids much more successfully than we teach ours. As might be expected, this virtual monopoly of the Progressive method in K-12 schools (some charter schools are exceptions but a majority are not) has caused the input to our colleges and universities to be of reduced quality. A direct result is the trend to dumb down the curricula in college because making up for the lost time in K-12 just would require too much work from the faculty. Also, the colleges have an overhead problem. The administrative portion of their budgets has grown to epic proportions causing the schools to be much more interested in the level of student enrollment (tuition money rolling in to school coffers) than in providing a quality education.
When you are out of control you can do the right thing; cut budgets and bring the overhead in line with the ethic of providing a quality education. Or, you can say to hell with quality and lower standards allowing enrollment to grow to support the overhead. Is there widespread integrity among the faculties of our colleges today? It doesn’t appear so. That is why the trend to dumb down curricula requirements is virtually unstoppable without public outrage to stem the tide.
How bad is it? Here is some data from the ACTA 2009 report, What Will They Learn, A Report on General Education Requirements at 100 of the Nation’s Leading Colleges and Universities. This 55 page report is available on the goacta.org website in the publications area.
ACTA considers that a core college curriculum is challenging, content-rich, and coherent—and it is something that is not necessarily gained in simply amassing 120 credit hours over eight semesters. The ACTA method is to evaluate the general education requirements of each school in the study in seven areas; Composition, Literature, Foreign Language, U.S. Government or History, Economics, Mathematics and Natural or Physical Science. They describe what each requirement means in terms of rigor. Their scoring of the 100 institutions studied involves how many of the core requirements are present in each school. Those with 6 or 7 rate an A grade, 4 or 5 a B, 3 a C, 2 a D, 0 or 1 an F.
ACTA looked at the top 20 National Universities and the top 20 Liberal Arts Colleges as reported in the 2009 US News and World Report America’s Best College Rankings. They also studied the major public universities from all 50 states. Out of the 100 studied, 25 received a grade of F, 17 got D’s and 20 got C’s. Only 33 of the 100 received a B and only 5 achieved an A.
Based on the study ACTA concluded colleges are not delivering on their promises. Of the top 20 national universities, not one earned an A, 4 earned a B, 5 a C, 2 a D and fully 9 earned an F. For the top 20 liberal arts colleges the record is especially depressing. One received an A, 3 received Bs, 2 Cs, 1 D, and 13 received Fs. Of the 60 state Flagships, 4 earned As, 26 earned Bs, 13 earned Cs, 14 received Ds and 3 received Fs.
It is interesting to note that when it comes to education bang for the buck, it is hard to beat the state flagship schools. I won’t argue that the “good old boy” connections you develop in one of the other schools are not of value. However, the primary mission of the schools is to provide a quality education and that should be the priority. Resting on the laurels of your past glory should not.
ACTA is currently arguing against the University of Arkansas which received an A rating but is planning to implement the dumb down approach. ACTA’s argument is that the current high quality requirements should be kept in place. You can read about this fight on their website and access detail on the weak courses that will fill the requirements for graduation at many of the schools studied by accessing the full report on the ACTA website.
This trend is cutting the heart out of our civilization. If you care you need to support the ACTA effort and also the needed reform of our K-12 schools.
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
To My Grandchildren
Dear Logan, Blake, Tori, Scot, Addison and Sam,
I want you to know when you are facing the problems of runaway government spending, hyper-inflation, a dollar not worth the paper it is printed on, and record high unemployment that I am sorry. I tried to get people motivated to fix our education system so that you could be well prepared for the rising global meritocracy I saw coming. However, I was ineffective in rallying support for you and your peers. The educators and all of their support entities were just too strong in their resolve to prevent any change in the education process that might force them to really teach you what you needed to know to compete and have a decent life.
The teachers unions were particularly effective in “buying” votes of politicians by spending heavily on their campaigns for office. With their national presence they were able to throw large sums of money into specific political races where they saw a threat to the continuation of their “we are overworked and underpaid” scam on the American public. And the Administrators were more than happy to let the unions do the heavy lifting to protect all educators’ place at the government trough.
I am sorry that I was unable to discredit the false propaganda from the educartel that gave the impression that our K-12 education system was performing well. I tried to point out the abysmal failure of our education system and the fallacy of educator beliefs taught to them like a theology, catechism style. I tried to educate people on the huge gap between what your competitors in other countries were learning and what American kids were being taught. However, the educators insistence that civility be observed at all times effectively suppressed the truth of their poor performance in preparing you for the stiff competition represented by your international peers who consistently were getting better educations.
I tried to rally your parents to get more involved but it was easier for them to be too busy, involved in work and play to take the time to help sound the alarm. I learned too late that talking rationally to the educators was doomed to failure. They had practiced for decades ways to delay any needed change. They just didn’t care about you and other kids especially if any harder work or better performance or more subject knowledge were required of them. They talked a good line but that was as far as it went. Tragically that was enough to convince most of the public that while that other city or state’s schools might be in trouble, their local ones were doing fine.
The educators were especially effective in their ability to sidetrack any board of education scrutiny by keeping their meeting agenda so full of administrivia that they were too busy to look at the truth of performance and do anything to correct it.
I realized too late that it would take marshalling enough political power to force educators to change because they were not motivated by your need for better schooling if any pain were required on their parts. Please learn from my experience as you work so hard to pull yourself and the country out of the hole your parents and grandparents allowed to be created.
I want you to know when you are facing the problems of runaway government spending, hyper-inflation, a dollar not worth the paper it is printed on, and record high unemployment that I am sorry. I tried to get people motivated to fix our education system so that you could be well prepared for the rising global meritocracy I saw coming. However, I was ineffective in rallying support for you and your peers. The educators and all of their support entities were just too strong in their resolve to prevent any change in the education process that might force them to really teach you what you needed to know to compete and have a decent life.
The teachers unions were particularly effective in “buying” votes of politicians by spending heavily on their campaigns for office. With their national presence they were able to throw large sums of money into specific political races where they saw a threat to the continuation of their “we are overworked and underpaid” scam on the American public. And the Administrators were more than happy to let the unions do the heavy lifting to protect all educators’ place at the government trough.
I am sorry that I was unable to discredit the false propaganda from the educartel that gave the impression that our K-12 education system was performing well. I tried to point out the abysmal failure of our education system and the fallacy of educator beliefs taught to them like a theology, catechism style. I tried to educate people on the huge gap between what your competitors in other countries were learning and what American kids were being taught. However, the educators insistence that civility be observed at all times effectively suppressed the truth of their poor performance in preparing you for the stiff competition represented by your international peers who consistently were getting better educations.
I tried to rally your parents to get more involved but it was easier for them to be too busy, involved in work and play to take the time to help sound the alarm. I learned too late that talking rationally to the educators was doomed to failure. They had practiced for decades ways to delay any needed change. They just didn’t care about you and other kids especially if any harder work or better performance or more subject knowledge were required of them. They talked a good line but that was as far as it went. Tragically that was enough to convince most of the public that while that other city or state’s schools might be in trouble, their local ones were doing fine.
The educators were especially effective in their ability to sidetrack any board of education scrutiny by keeping their meeting agenda so full of administrivia that they were too busy to look at the truth of performance and do anything to correct it.
I realized too late that it would take marshalling enough political power to force educators to change because they were not motivated by your need for better schooling if any pain were required on their parts. Please learn from my experience as you work so hard to pull yourself and the country out of the hole your parents and grandparents allowed to be created.
Monday, June 14, 2010
You’re Not Nice
This is a comment I often hear after I post a blog on education that is critical of our education performance and especially if critical of educators. Thus, I would like to explore the reasons with you.
First, we need to face some realities:
• American education performance has been mired in unacceptable territory for many decades.
• Educators have defined the problems as being the fault of everyone but themselves. Mirrors are outlawed in education venues. Pogo cartoons are also not allowed.
• The achievement gap is not changing for the better. The Colorado Closing the Achievement Gap Commission Final Report of 11/05 concluded that over the last third of a century the gap had gotten “demonstrably worse” in spite of spending billions to find solutions. Robert Kennedy called the gap a stain on our national honor but that hasn’t motivated educators to take the known steps required to fix it. They won’t allow themselves to admit they are wrong in their beliefs about what works in education.
• American students are not being prepared for the global competition for knowledge based jobs.
• The remediation rate for those who go to 2 or 4 year colleges is very high and not being reduced.
• Education schools overemphasize pedagogy to the virtual exclusion of subject knowledge. And the pedagogy they teach is technically wrong in important ways.
• The reason for this state of affairs – tragic for millions of students as well as for the nation – is that an army of American educators and reading experts are fundamentally wrong in their ideas about education . . . E.D. Hirsch, The Knowledge Deficit
The list could be a lot longer but I hope you get the point. The problems in education are not being addressed effectively and kids and their futures are being irreparably harmed. Thus, if we assume that we must play by the educators’ rules the status quo will continue ad infinitum:
• Civility and harmony at all times—that is, suppress the truth because it might lead to stressful situations.
• Swear fealty to educators as the education experts and agree that no education outsider has any grounds to identify problems or offer constructive criticism.
• Parrot the educator line that they are underpaid and overworked. Which considering their performance is totally false.
• Agree to leave all education decisions to the educators because they are the experts.
• Agree to the status quo preserving process educators use to maintain control and ensure no change occurs that might require them to perform better or renounce their false educational beliefs.
After 7 years working on understanding the education situation, interviewing numerous educators over 6 states and associated people like school board members, state education department denizens and members of the public, I realized that being civil and trying to reason with people in the education establishment was futile. They have simply decided that their vested interest is more important than serving the kids’ needs at the level they deserve.
Therefore, the question comes down to a simple one. Are you on the side of the poorly performing education bureaucracy or are you on the side of the kids and their future. That is an easy decision for me and hopefully for you. E.D. Hirsch has been working on this problem for decades longer than I have. He has concluded that educators will not change on their own. They will have to be forced by public and political pressure. I write the things I do on education in an attempt to inform the public on the reality in education. I am attempting to get people to go beyond the pseudo “good news” propaganda that is ubiquitously offered by the education establishment. Being nice when kids are being continually harmed has a very low priority for me.
The above applies to the mainline schools. There are charter schools (not all by any means) that perform much better than the mainline schools. This is especially true if they have strong leadership and a balanced philosophy where subject knowledge is valued. However, these schools affect a tiny minority of students. We must reform the mainline schools to make a difference for millions of kids.
First, we need to face some realities:
• American education performance has been mired in unacceptable territory for many decades.
• Educators have defined the problems as being the fault of everyone but themselves. Mirrors are outlawed in education venues. Pogo cartoons are also not allowed.
• The achievement gap is not changing for the better. The Colorado Closing the Achievement Gap Commission Final Report of 11/05 concluded that over the last third of a century the gap had gotten “demonstrably worse” in spite of spending billions to find solutions. Robert Kennedy called the gap a stain on our national honor but that hasn’t motivated educators to take the known steps required to fix it. They won’t allow themselves to admit they are wrong in their beliefs about what works in education.
• American students are not being prepared for the global competition for knowledge based jobs.
• The remediation rate for those who go to 2 or 4 year colleges is very high and not being reduced.
• Education schools overemphasize pedagogy to the virtual exclusion of subject knowledge. And the pedagogy they teach is technically wrong in important ways.
• The reason for this state of affairs – tragic for millions of students as well as for the nation – is that an army of American educators and reading experts are fundamentally wrong in their ideas about education . . . E.D. Hirsch, The Knowledge Deficit
The list could be a lot longer but I hope you get the point. The problems in education are not being addressed effectively and kids and their futures are being irreparably harmed. Thus, if we assume that we must play by the educators’ rules the status quo will continue ad infinitum:
• Civility and harmony at all times—that is, suppress the truth because it might lead to stressful situations.
• Swear fealty to educators as the education experts and agree that no education outsider has any grounds to identify problems or offer constructive criticism.
• Parrot the educator line that they are underpaid and overworked. Which considering their performance is totally false.
• Agree to leave all education decisions to the educators because they are the experts.
• Agree to the status quo preserving process educators use to maintain control and ensure no change occurs that might require them to perform better or renounce their false educational beliefs.
After 7 years working on understanding the education situation, interviewing numerous educators over 6 states and associated people like school board members, state education department denizens and members of the public, I realized that being civil and trying to reason with people in the education establishment was futile. They have simply decided that their vested interest is more important than serving the kids’ needs at the level they deserve.
Therefore, the question comes down to a simple one. Are you on the side of the poorly performing education bureaucracy or are you on the side of the kids and their future. That is an easy decision for me and hopefully for you. E.D. Hirsch has been working on this problem for decades longer than I have. He has concluded that educators will not change on their own. They will have to be forced by public and political pressure. I write the things I do on education in an attempt to inform the public on the reality in education. I am attempting to get people to go beyond the pseudo “good news” propaganda that is ubiquitously offered by the education establishment. Being nice when kids are being continually harmed has a very low priority for me.
The above applies to the mainline schools. There are charter schools (not all by any means) that perform much better than the mainline schools. This is especially true if they have strong leadership and a balanced philosophy where subject knowledge is valued. However, these schools affect a tiny minority of students. We must reform the mainline schools to make a difference for millions of kids.
Thursday, June 3, 2010
Do Our Schools Prepare Kids for Factory Work or Knowledge Work?
While there is much posturing and TALK about preparing kids for knowledge jobs (21st Century Skills, etc.), there has been virtually no change in the substance of what is taught and how it is taught since the system was designed a century ago to prepare the masses for production line work in factories. Change is required, not talk if our kids are to be prepared to compete in a very different world than existed in the early twentieth century. Experts like Diane Ravitch have pointed out that the 21st Century Skills movement is an excuse to bring back failed old ideas with new and improved labels. This is not progress. It is criminal fraud and it hurts our kids.
During my education research over the last 7 years I have run into one comment more than any other from teachers about subjects they are tasked to teach. It could be paraphrased as, “I didn’t do well in math. I don’t like math, but I have to try to teach it to my kids.” Let me ask you, do you think the kids will learn well from someone who has a poor understanding of math and such a strong distaste for it?
Why worry about it, you might say. We must concern ourselves because math skill and knowledge are becoming increasingly more important now with the intensified trend toward knowledge work and the high level of global competition to get those good, well-paying jobs. Why is math important? Because--
• Math is the language we use to understand and model the world we live in. Rigorous math is used in most fields of endeavor. We all know that it is vital for scientists, engineers and applied mathematicians. However, math is used in research in many fields as they attempt to better understand their area of interest. It is used in medicine, psychology, education, and businesses of all types.
• Studying and working with math is good exercise for our reasoning powers. It is the best area of study to teach problem formulation and definition. In the real world problems are not presented as in dumbed down math texts where the data in the problem is the only data you need to solve it. In the real world there is an abundance of data that is meaningless to solving most problems. The key is to formulate the problem so that the important data is captured giving understanding to the causes and solutions for the problem at hand.
• Math is fun. Math is beautiful in its elegant structure.
Now the question to ask is do we keep preparing K-12 students for “do as you are told, factory work” as the whole process was designed to do or do we change to a system that facilitates and encourages all students to learn to their full potential. Factory work is continuing to decline as a career opportunity in today’s age of outsourcing and automation. To change for the better we will need to break some stereotypes. The first one and most hateful of all is. “Girls aren’t good at math and if they are there is something wrong with them.” This belief held by too many teachers, parents and others is a harmful self-fulfilling prophecy that dooms too many girls to poor performance in math. Perhaps its mirror image for boys is that they can’t do as well as girls in literacy areas. Both boys and girls have the ability to excel in both areas, especially with the low expectation curricula being used in our K-12 mainline schools.
For girls in elementary classes where most teachers are women, seeing their teachers distaste for math that always shows through, no matter how positive they try to be creates poor role models. “Gee, if Miss MacGuilicudy can’t do math, how could I ever do it?” As in any psychologically corrupt environment, students who violate the expected norms are subtly punished to get them into line with the expectation.
To change will require teaching teachers to learn to love math instead of fear it. The education schools can’t do this as they are populated with pseudo math staff who also fear and dislike math. The exception is when the government gives them a multimillion dollar grant to “invent” a math curriculum that will work to conceal the teachers’ lack of math skill. Even though they don’t understand math well at all they come up with a discovery curriculum that transforms the teacher into a facilitator of group discussions as kids “discover” how to solve problems. The problems “solved” are trivial. They have to be because the kids can’t solve them with the discovery method unless they are. This curriculum has spread across the nation like wildfire because educators want to be freed from the responsibility to really teach math as a hierarchy that builds on foundations learned in the previous year. The whole premise is like preparing to cross a great wilderness with a guide or without one. Wandering in the wilderness is not what we should be after in education. We need guides (teachers) who know the way through the wilderness. You only need to look at the discovery process and how it might apply to say, The Calculus, to realize the approach is ridiculous. While Newton developed The Calculus at age 19 to help him analyze physical phenomena, I defy you to assert that the discovery method would be an efficient way to train future scientists, engineers and mathematicians in The Calculus. You see that is the real problem. The constructivist/discovery methods take much longer than direct instruction to teach the material. That is why kids early in their K-12 careers do better than they do in the middle and high school grades. In the discovery process it is too easy for students to “discover the wrong principle” which undermines the foundation they need in the future.
The result? Kids who are exposed to this fraud reach middle and high school totally unprepared for algebra and beyond. Then the middle and high school teachers have to try to make up years of lost time and teach the new material too. No wonder the math performance of high school students is so poor. Oh, there are exceptions who do get it because their parents taught them or provided tutors to fill the void. Most students however, don’t have that advantage and end up turned off and incompetent in math. This limits their future possibilities greatly and since it affects so many students it affects the whole nation’s competitiveness.
The first thing you must realize is that the vast majority of educators do not understand subject matter. You pick the subject and they haven’t been exposed to it in more than a highly diffuse and superficial way. Yet, they have no problem posturing as experts to enable them to ignore the truth that is offered by those who do understand subject matter. Rita Kramer described the problem well in her bestselling book, Ed School Follies. “The people who become ‘educators’ and who run our school systems usually have degrees in education, psychology, social sciences, public administration; they are not people who have studied, know, and love literature, history, science, or philosophy. Our ‘educators’ are not educated. They do not love learning. Naturally enough, they think of the past as dead because it has never been alive to them. And they will not bring it alive for their pupils.”
In math this has led to “holding the fort” against all appeals for objective review of the harm being done by the ridiculous approach to teaching math. The same argument can apply to literacy and other curriculum areas. The way the educators have been able to turn away the constructive criticism is to employ “outside” experts to approve their approach. Thus, they hire outside, education school educated consultants to review their program and offer ideas on making it better.
Of course, the public who hears of what sounds a reasonable approach do not understand that the “outside experts” come from the same weak, diffuse and superficial training as the school officials who hire them for the review. Do not be fooled, if a person has a doctorate or masters in education they are not educated. Arthur Levine in his research into education schools concluded that they “confer masters on those who display anything but mastery and doctorates in name only.” While some educators have learned subjects in other studies or on their own, most have not. In general, while well meaning, these people have nothing of value to add to improving our kids’ education and it is time that the public became aware of it. We must demand positive action to face the reality of the poor educator performance and poor understanding of what works that is hurting our kids.
During my education research over the last 7 years I have run into one comment more than any other from teachers about subjects they are tasked to teach. It could be paraphrased as, “I didn’t do well in math. I don’t like math, but I have to try to teach it to my kids.” Let me ask you, do you think the kids will learn well from someone who has a poor understanding of math and such a strong distaste for it?
Why worry about it, you might say. We must concern ourselves because math skill and knowledge are becoming increasingly more important now with the intensified trend toward knowledge work and the high level of global competition to get those good, well-paying jobs. Why is math important? Because--
• Math is the language we use to understand and model the world we live in. Rigorous math is used in most fields of endeavor. We all know that it is vital for scientists, engineers and applied mathematicians. However, math is used in research in many fields as they attempt to better understand their area of interest. It is used in medicine, psychology, education, and businesses of all types.
• Studying and working with math is good exercise for our reasoning powers. It is the best area of study to teach problem formulation and definition. In the real world problems are not presented as in dumbed down math texts where the data in the problem is the only data you need to solve it. In the real world there is an abundance of data that is meaningless to solving most problems. The key is to formulate the problem so that the important data is captured giving understanding to the causes and solutions for the problem at hand.
• Math is fun. Math is beautiful in its elegant structure.
Now the question to ask is do we keep preparing K-12 students for “do as you are told, factory work” as the whole process was designed to do or do we change to a system that facilitates and encourages all students to learn to their full potential. Factory work is continuing to decline as a career opportunity in today’s age of outsourcing and automation. To change for the better we will need to break some stereotypes. The first one and most hateful of all is. “Girls aren’t good at math and if they are there is something wrong with them.” This belief held by too many teachers, parents and others is a harmful self-fulfilling prophecy that dooms too many girls to poor performance in math. Perhaps its mirror image for boys is that they can’t do as well as girls in literacy areas. Both boys and girls have the ability to excel in both areas, especially with the low expectation curricula being used in our K-12 mainline schools.
For girls in elementary classes where most teachers are women, seeing their teachers distaste for math that always shows through, no matter how positive they try to be creates poor role models. “Gee, if Miss MacGuilicudy can’t do math, how could I ever do it?” As in any psychologically corrupt environment, students who violate the expected norms are subtly punished to get them into line with the expectation.
To change will require teaching teachers to learn to love math instead of fear it. The education schools can’t do this as they are populated with pseudo math staff who also fear and dislike math. The exception is when the government gives them a multimillion dollar grant to “invent” a math curriculum that will work to conceal the teachers’ lack of math skill. Even though they don’t understand math well at all they come up with a discovery curriculum that transforms the teacher into a facilitator of group discussions as kids “discover” how to solve problems. The problems “solved” are trivial. They have to be because the kids can’t solve them with the discovery method unless they are. This curriculum has spread across the nation like wildfire because educators want to be freed from the responsibility to really teach math as a hierarchy that builds on foundations learned in the previous year. The whole premise is like preparing to cross a great wilderness with a guide or without one. Wandering in the wilderness is not what we should be after in education. We need guides (teachers) who know the way through the wilderness. You only need to look at the discovery process and how it might apply to say, The Calculus, to realize the approach is ridiculous. While Newton developed The Calculus at age 19 to help him analyze physical phenomena, I defy you to assert that the discovery method would be an efficient way to train future scientists, engineers and mathematicians in The Calculus. You see that is the real problem. The constructivist/discovery methods take much longer than direct instruction to teach the material. That is why kids early in their K-12 careers do better than they do in the middle and high school grades. In the discovery process it is too easy for students to “discover the wrong principle” which undermines the foundation they need in the future.
The result? Kids who are exposed to this fraud reach middle and high school totally unprepared for algebra and beyond. Then the middle and high school teachers have to try to make up years of lost time and teach the new material too. No wonder the math performance of high school students is so poor. Oh, there are exceptions who do get it because their parents taught them or provided tutors to fill the void. Most students however, don’t have that advantage and end up turned off and incompetent in math. This limits their future possibilities greatly and since it affects so many students it affects the whole nation’s competitiveness.
The first thing you must realize is that the vast majority of educators do not understand subject matter. You pick the subject and they haven’t been exposed to it in more than a highly diffuse and superficial way. Yet, they have no problem posturing as experts to enable them to ignore the truth that is offered by those who do understand subject matter. Rita Kramer described the problem well in her bestselling book, Ed School Follies. “The people who become ‘educators’ and who run our school systems usually have degrees in education, psychology, social sciences, public administration; they are not people who have studied, know, and love literature, history, science, or philosophy. Our ‘educators’ are not educated. They do not love learning. Naturally enough, they think of the past as dead because it has never been alive to them. And they will not bring it alive for their pupils.”
In math this has led to “holding the fort” against all appeals for objective review of the harm being done by the ridiculous approach to teaching math. The same argument can apply to literacy and other curriculum areas. The way the educators have been able to turn away the constructive criticism is to employ “outside” experts to approve their approach. Thus, they hire outside, education school educated consultants to review their program and offer ideas on making it better.
Of course, the public who hears of what sounds a reasonable approach do not understand that the “outside experts” come from the same weak, diffuse and superficial training as the school officials who hire them for the review. Do not be fooled, if a person has a doctorate or masters in education they are not educated. Arthur Levine in his research into education schools concluded that they “confer masters on those who display anything but mastery and doctorates in name only.” While some educators have learned subjects in other studies or on their own, most have not. In general, while well meaning, these people have nothing of value to add to improving our kids’ education and it is time that the public became aware of it. We must demand positive action to face the reality of the poor educator performance and poor understanding of what works that is hurting our kids.
Thursday, May 20, 2010
NAEP vs. TIMSS, 8th grade Math
Translating NAEP to TIMSS % Proficient or better
Singapore 73
S. Korea 65
Hong Kong 64
Japan & Chinese Taipei 61
Belgium (Flemish) 51
Netherlands 41
Hungary, Slovak Rep., Slovenia, Canada,
Russia, Australia 39 to 35
Czech Rep., Malaysia, Bulgaria, Finland 32 to 29
United States 27
Data taken from Linking NAEP Achievement Levels to TIMSS, American Institutes for Research (2007)
NAEP is our National Assessment of Educational Progress, i.e. our national test. In general the NAEP standards are consistently higher than those of the individual states who chose to reduce their standards to make complying with the No Child Left Behind requirement that all students be proficient or better by 2014 easier. That is, the states took the low road. If you want your performance to look better than it is, choose a short ruler to measure it.
TIMSS is The International Math and Science Study. The chart above lists only the countries whose kids scored better than ours in math for 8th graders. I chose the 8th grade level because it is a pivot point. That is, at fourth grade we do a little better and at high school level we do worse.
Most American mainline schools’ approach to teaching math is to use constructivist or discovery methods as embodied in EveryDay Math, for example. This approach does not build the foundational math skills during the elementary years required for success in algebra and higher math. Thus, as our kids progress through the grades they do worse and worse which is reinforced by TIMSS and other testing. This approach is definitely not preparing our kids to compete in the rising global meritocracy for the well paying knowledge-based jobs. This approach does make it easier for the elementary teachers who do not have adequate math knowledge to teach the foundational math skills required to be successful.It casts them in a facilitator role instead of a teacher role.
Research such as that of Liping Ma which compared American and Chinese elementary math teachers found the American teachers although “more educated” than their Chinese counterparts did not have the math understanding needed. This is no surprise since education schools prioritize pedagogy to the virtual exclusion of content training in their programs.
Our educators approach to math is what I call the Platte River Syndrome. That is the curriculum is a mile wide and an inch deep. This diffuse approach wastes lots of time that could and should be spent on building a strong foundation of hierarchical skills which is how math works.
A quote from the Singapore Ministry of Education is instructive, from their Nurturing Every Child, booklet (2006), “Teach Less, Learn More--Syllabuses will be trimmed without diluting students’ preparedness for higher education. This will free up time for our students to focus on core knowledge and skills.” You see in the chart above the validity of the Singapore approach and the failure of our approach.
One last comment, E.D. Hirsch, the stimulus for the Massachusetts Miracle (legislature required the ditching of constructivist curricula and achievement soared), says that educators are so brainwashed in their technically wrong beliefs that they will only change if forced to from the outside. That is, parents need to demand change and expect their political representatives to force it to happen. This is an area where negotiation with educators only delays the lifeline the kids so desperately need. Oh, the final nail in the coffin is that the constructivist curricula hurt the gap kids (minority and economically disadvantaged) the most.
Singapore 73
S. Korea 65
Hong Kong 64
Japan & Chinese Taipei 61
Belgium (Flemish) 51
Netherlands 41
Hungary, Slovak Rep., Slovenia, Canada,
Russia, Australia 39 to 35
Czech Rep., Malaysia, Bulgaria, Finland 32 to 29
United States 27
Data taken from Linking NAEP Achievement Levels to TIMSS, American Institutes for Research (2007)
NAEP is our National Assessment of Educational Progress, i.e. our national test. In general the NAEP standards are consistently higher than those of the individual states who chose to reduce their standards to make complying with the No Child Left Behind requirement that all students be proficient or better by 2014 easier. That is, the states took the low road. If you want your performance to look better than it is, choose a short ruler to measure it.
TIMSS is The International Math and Science Study. The chart above lists only the countries whose kids scored better than ours in math for 8th graders. I chose the 8th grade level because it is a pivot point. That is, at fourth grade we do a little better and at high school level we do worse.
Most American mainline schools’ approach to teaching math is to use constructivist or discovery methods as embodied in EveryDay Math, for example. This approach does not build the foundational math skills during the elementary years required for success in algebra and higher math. Thus, as our kids progress through the grades they do worse and worse which is reinforced by TIMSS and other testing. This approach is definitely not preparing our kids to compete in the rising global meritocracy for the well paying knowledge-based jobs. This approach does make it easier for the elementary teachers who do not have adequate math knowledge to teach the foundational math skills required to be successful.It casts them in a facilitator role instead of a teacher role.
Research such as that of Liping Ma which compared American and Chinese elementary math teachers found the American teachers although “more educated” than their Chinese counterparts did not have the math understanding needed. This is no surprise since education schools prioritize pedagogy to the virtual exclusion of content training in their programs.
Our educators approach to math is what I call the Platte River Syndrome. That is the curriculum is a mile wide and an inch deep. This diffuse approach wastes lots of time that could and should be spent on building a strong foundation of hierarchical skills which is how math works.
A quote from the Singapore Ministry of Education is instructive, from their Nurturing Every Child, booklet (2006), “Teach Less, Learn More--Syllabuses will be trimmed without diluting students’ preparedness for higher education. This will free up time for our students to focus on core knowledge and skills.” You see in the chart above the validity of the Singapore approach and the failure of our approach.
One last comment, E.D. Hirsch, the stimulus for the Massachusetts Miracle (legislature required the ditching of constructivist curricula and achievement soared), says that educators are so brainwashed in their technically wrong beliefs that they will only change if forced to from the outside. That is, parents need to demand change and expect their political representatives to force it to happen. This is an area where negotiation with educators only delays the lifeline the kids so desperately need. Oh, the final nail in the coffin is that the constructivist curricula hurt the gap kids (minority and economically disadvantaged) the most.
Friday, May 14, 2010
What I want to be when I grow up.
I want to grow up to be a robot.
Educators and parents please train me to be compliant to the will of the experts who run our country. Please train me to be gullible so that I will believe anything they say even if untrue. Please train me to be ignorant of the lessons of history. Please train me to be unable to think, analyze and decide on my own. Please make sure that my literacy, math, science and history knowledge are low enough that I don’t question what leaders say. Please train me to be happy with less and less personal responsibility and freedom.
Please say you care about me even though you don’t. Please take care of my health until my usefulness diminishes to the point where further maintenance is in your expert opinion too expensive. Please feed me and protect me from the truth because I am not able to handle it. Please make sure my schools do not train me in the subject knowledge required to be able to understand what is going on. I don’t want to know, it gives me a headache. Please keep the bad news from me for as long as possible, I don’t want to hear it.
And most of all please take care of me always.
I want to grow up to be an American
Educators and parents please reinstate the education philosophy that culminated in the American Common School movement that made American education the envy of the world from the 1830s through the 1950s. Please eliminate the “how to” approach which has been a miserable failure and re-establish the rigorous content-rich curricula, taught by subject knowledgeable teachers approach, of the American Common Schools.
Please teach me through competitive practice that I can build on my failures to perform better over time. Help me gain the mental toughness and “can do” spirit needed to effectively meet the growing global competition for good, well paid jobs. Please expect me to fully appreciate America’s history objectively. Help me to appreciate the struggles and the profound luck we had as a people to be led at our founding by incredibly clear-thinking and committed leaders.
Please help me to embrace high standards of personal performance in all things. Help me to realize that there is no free lunch and if it is to be, it is up to me. Help me to appreciate personal responsibility and personal freedom as guaranteed in the U. S. Constitution.
Most of all teach me to continually question and analyze the pronouncements of our leaders to discern the underlying truth. Teach me enough that I can make my own assessments regarding the latest claim of those who want to take more control of our lives by creating a pseudo-crisis.
Adults please lead by example modeling the ability to set high standards for yourselves.
Teach me to be an American.
Educators and parents please train me to be compliant to the will of the experts who run our country. Please train me to be gullible so that I will believe anything they say even if untrue. Please train me to be ignorant of the lessons of history. Please train me to be unable to think, analyze and decide on my own. Please make sure that my literacy, math, science and history knowledge are low enough that I don’t question what leaders say. Please train me to be happy with less and less personal responsibility and freedom.
Please say you care about me even though you don’t. Please take care of my health until my usefulness diminishes to the point where further maintenance is in your expert opinion too expensive. Please feed me and protect me from the truth because I am not able to handle it. Please make sure my schools do not train me in the subject knowledge required to be able to understand what is going on. I don’t want to know, it gives me a headache. Please keep the bad news from me for as long as possible, I don’t want to hear it.
And most of all please take care of me always.
I want to grow up to be an American
Educators and parents please reinstate the education philosophy that culminated in the American Common School movement that made American education the envy of the world from the 1830s through the 1950s. Please eliminate the “how to” approach which has been a miserable failure and re-establish the rigorous content-rich curricula, taught by subject knowledgeable teachers approach, of the American Common Schools.
Please teach me through competitive practice that I can build on my failures to perform better over time. Help me gain the mental toughness and “can do” spirit needed to effectively meet the growing global competition for good, well paid jobs. Please expect me to fully appreciate America’s history objectively. Help me to appreciate the struggles and the profound luck we had as a people to be led at our founding by incredibly clear-thinking and committed leaders.
Please help me to embrace high standards of personal performance in all things. Help me to realize that there is no free lunch and if it is to be, it is up to me. Help me to appreciate personal responsibility and personal freedom as guaranteed in the U. S. Constitution.
Most of all teach me to continually question and analyze the pronouncements of our leaders to discern the underlying truth. Teach me enough that I can make my own assessments regarding the latest claim of those who want to take more control of our lives by creating a pseudo-crisis.
Adults please lead by example modeling the ability to set high standards for yourselves.
Teach me to be an American.
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
The News Isn’t Good, But Then in Education When is it Ever?
On May 4, the Colorado Dept. of Education announced the 3rd grade reading results for schools and districts around the state. The numbers scoring proficient or better dropped significantly for almost all districts. On the ten o’clock news the coverage included a third grader who was reading very well thank you, as if one kid reading well could offset the abysmal results. While there may be significant insight to be gained by parsing the data in great detail as a whole this report should finally wake us up to the fact that our education system is not doing the job acceptably.
That is hardly new. Robert Frost in his famous poem, The Road Not Taken, talks of taking a road less traveled that has made all the difference. In his case you assume a positive outcome. Our education system took a “road less traveled” at least in American education experience to that day back in the 1930s when the Progressives took control of all American schools of education. By the 1960s virtually all graduates of American high schools had been subjected to the progressive content free curricula during their whole school career. Beginning in the 1960s, SAT verbal scores plummeted and have been mired at their lower levels since then. In spite of educators’ excuses that this drop is caused by more minority and economically disadvantaged students taking the test, scores have gone down for all demographic groups.
The progressive detour from an education system that was the envy of the world has been a disaster. The work that Noah Webster and Horace Mann among others did to create the American Common School concept with rigorous curricula and high standards has been gutted and replaced by theories and curricula that simply have not worked and as E.D. Hirsch says cannot work because they are technically wrong at their foundation. I will leave it with you in the context of the Greek rioting to ponder the wisdom of the progressive approach which is designed to create a populace dependent on the state and prone to having their lives run by so called experts who know better. Greece’s current problems are a good example of what lies down the road if you create a nanny state where the people become dependent on the state for more and more and the incentives are to be anything but independent and self-sufficient. When the money runs out, and it always does, the immature citizens who haven’t learned to be independent start throwing tantrums like children.
Putting the New Results in Context
• Research has shown that if kids can’t read at grade level by 3rd grade the odds are they never will become competent readers.
• Colorado standards are at the low end of all states for rigor in both Reading and Math. Thus reading at grade level in Colorado is not the same as reading at grade level in Massachusetts.
• The gap between advantaged and disadvantaged demographic groups is large and staying that way. This has been the norm for decades in spite of throwing billions of dollars at the problem which have only gone to enrich education insiders, but haven’t helped the kids at all. Hirsch asserts correctly that the progressive content free curricula hurt the “gap kids” the most.
So Why Can’t We Seem to Turn Back to What Works in Education?
• Education schools are staffed by “true believers” in the progressive mantra and they aren’t going to change unless forced to. They teach their process only, virtually no subject knowledge philosophy to their students “like a catechism” as Hirsch describes it.
• Education is an extremely insular place. The “faithful” continue to reinforce the tragically wrong principles they were taught in education school to the exclusion of the truth. Outside input is rebuffed or worn down by well practiced delay tactics like creating committees, hiring consultants who are card carrying members of the education tribe, or even ignoring the input altogether.
• I was told by several superintendents when questioning the poor performance and the impact on kids that, “You don’t understand. Education is run for the benefit of the adults who work here, not the kids.” With that attitude, the educators have abdicated any semblance of professional responsibility or ethics to perform the function of educating kids well.
• Realize that the status quo crowd staff the state and federal education bureaucracies (they don’t want to admit their education school training is harming kids), the book publishers who find it easier to produce content free, watered down texts, the education “press” and the education researchers who access huge amounts of government and foundation money to polish the rotten apples.
• Hirsch concludes and he is right that educators will not reinstate what really works for kids unless they are forced to by outside forces.
• The constructivist curricula like Whole Language (and its renamed progeny to disguise the use of proven to be wrong methods) and EveryDay Math have been failures and will never work well. Big expensive programs like Marie Clay’s and also RTI are basically bandages on the curricula that can never work well enough. That is, a total waste of resources in an effort to try something new to deflect attention away from the core problem.
There are many other problems. Education leaders preen in the false glory of their advanced degrees even though Arthur Levine concluded in his Educating School Leaders (2005) based on a study of all degree granting education school programs that the education doctorate had no value for any public school administration job and that the schools were conferring masters on those who displayed anything but mastery and doctorates in name only. Teachers lack the subject knowledge depth that is required to teach the subjects effectively. The results being turned in make it obvious that Levine is right.
How Do We Begin to Deliver the Message That We Expect the Educators to Improve Their Performance?
Confrontation is the only way as uncomfortable as that may be. We must –
• Spread the word to neighbors, relatives, co-workers and friends that the education propaganda is just that, an effort to maintain the cushy status quo for educators.
• Write and speak at school board meetings decrying the abysmal performance.
• We must question the salary levels of administrators especially superintendents who are not performing well enough to justify half their salaries.
• We must expect contracts of poor performers to be not renewed.
• We must let our state and federal elected representatives know that we expect better performance to benefit our kids and that false education theories that harm kids are not acceptable for even a minute more.
• We must have staying power. This is not a “speak at a school board meeting or write a letter to a congressman once affair.” We must adopt a Chinese Water Torture (made famous during the Korean War) approach by “dripping” the truth on educators constantly.
That is hardly new. Robert Frost in his famous poem, The Road Not Taken, talks of taking a road less traveled that has made all the difference. In his case you assume a positive outcome. Our education system took a “road less traveled” at least in American education experience to that day back in the 1930s when the Progressives took control of all American schools of education. By the 1960s virtually all graduates of American high schools had been subjected to the progressive content free curricula during their whole school career. Beginning in the 1960s, SAT verbal scores plummeted and have been mired at their lower levels since then. In spite of educators’ excuses that this drop is caused by more minority and economically disadvantaged students taking the test, scores have gone down for all demographic groups.
The progressive detour from an education system that was the envy of the world has been a disaster. The work that Noah Webster and Horace Mann among others did to create the American Common School concept with rigorous curricula and high standards has been gutted and replaced by theories and curricula that simply have not worked and as E.D. Hirsch says cannot work because they are technically wrong at their foundation. I will leave it with you in the context of the Greek rioting to ponder the wisdom of the progressive approach which is designed to create a populace dependent on the state and prone to having their lives run by so called experts who know better. Greece’s current problems are a good example of what lies down the road if you create a nanny state where the people become dependent on the state for more and more and the incentives are to be anything but independent and self-sufficient. When the money runs out, and it always does, the immature citizens who haven’t learned to be independent start throwing tantrums like children.
Putting the New Results in Context
• Research has shown that if kids can’t read at grade level by 3rd grade the odds are they never will become competent readers.
• Colorado standards are at the low end of all states for rigor in both Reading and Math. Thus reading at grade level in Colorado is not the same as reading at grade level in Massachusetts.
• The gap between advantaged and disadvantaged demographic groups is large and staying that way. This has been the norm for decades in spite of throwing billions of dollars at the problem which have only gone to enrich education insiders, but haven’t helped the kids at all. Hirsch asserts correctly that the progressive content free curricula hurt the “gap kids” the most.
So Why Can’t We Seem to Turn Back to What Works in Education?
• Education schools are staffed by “true believers” in the progressive mantra and they aren’t going to change unless forced to. They teach their process only, virtually no subject knowledge philosophy to their students “like a catechism” as Hirsch describes it.
• Education is an extremely insular place. The “faithful” continue to reinforce the tragically wrong principles they were taught in education school to the exclusion of the truth. Outside input is rebuffed or worn down by well practiced delay tactics like creating committees, hiring consultants who are card carrying members of the education tribe, or even ignoring the input altogether.
• I was told by several superintendents when questioning the poor performance and the impact on kids that, “You don’t understand. Education is run for the benefit of the adults who work here, not the kids.” With that attitude, the educators have abdicated any semblance of professional responsibility or ethics to perform the function of educating kids well.
• Realize that the status quo crowd staff the state and federal education bureaucracies (they don’t want to admit their education school training is harming kids), the book publishers who find it easier to produce content free, watered down texts, the education “press” and the education researchers who access huge amounts of government and foundation money to polish the rotten apples.
• Hirsch concludes and he is right that educators will not reinstate what really works for kids unless they are forced to by outside forces.
• The constructivist curricula like Whole Language (and its renamed progeny to disguise the use of proven to be wrong methods) and EveryDay Math have been failures and will never work well. Big expensive programs like Marie Clay’s and also RTI are basically bandages on the curricula that can never work well enough. That is, a total waste of resources in an effort to try something new to deflect attention away from the core problem.
There are many other problems. Education leaders preen in the false glory of their advanced degrees even though Arthur Levine concluded in his Educating School Leaders (2005) based on a study of all degree granting education school programs that the education doctorate had no value for any public school administration job and that the schools were conferring masters on those who displayed anything but mastery and doctorates in name only. Teachers lack the subject knowledge depth that is required to teach the subjects effectively. The results being turned in make it obvious that Levine is right.
How Do We Begin to Deliver the Message That We Expect the Educators to Improve Their Performance?
Confrontation is the only way as uncomfortable as that may be. We must –
• Spread the word to neighbors, relatives, co-workers and friends that the education propaganda is just that, an effort to maintain the cushy status quo for educators.
• Write and speak at school board meetings decrying the abysmal performance.
• We must question the salary levels of administrators especially superintendents who are not performing well enough to justify half their salaries.
• We must expect contracts of poor performers to be not renewed.
• We must let our state and federal elected representatives know that we expect better performance to benefit our kids and that false education theories that harm kids are not acceptable for even a minute more.
• We must have staying power. This is not a “speak at a school board meeting or write a letter to a congressman once affair.” We must adopt a Chinese Water Torture (made famous during the Korean War) approach by “dripping” the truth on educators constantly.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
